RA 5: Global Order and Security
RA 1
RA 2
RA 3
RA 4
RA 5
RA 6
Uncovering power, resistance, and inequality in global politics through critical perspectives on security, conflict, and transnational justice.
RA 5 Leads
KCL
Dr Jenna Marshall
QMUL
Dr Sharri Plonski
ICL
Dr William Proud
About this Research Area
This Research Area examines the dynamics of conflict, violence, and insecurity in the contemporary world, adopting an interdisciplinary and multi-scalar perspective. Central to its focus is a critical engagement with the structures of empire, colonialism, and racial capitalism that underpin global relations, as well as the ways in which these structures are resisted, reworked, and challenged. Research pays particular attention to voices and communities that are often marginalised in conventional accounts of global politics, including migrants, indigenous peoples, racialised groups, women, queer and trans communities, and working-class or rural populations. By foregrounding these perspectives, the area highlights the lived experiences and struggles that are central to the making and unmaking of global order.
Harnessing diverse data to understand conflict, power, and the changing dynamics of global security.
Methodologically, this Research Area is committed to approaches that “disrupt the present,” uncovering the material, discursive, and institutional systems that sustain violence while also exploring forms of care, solidarity, and resistance. Themes include critical security studies, international development, policing and border regimes, and transnational movements for liberation and justice. Students and researchers are encouraged to connect global frameworks to grounded empirical inquiry, thereby linking abstract structures to everyday experiences. The area ultimately seeks to advance more inclusive and ethically engaged understandings of global order and security.
Data Statement
Research Students
Doctoral projects in RA5 are expected to interrogate how power relations shape the production and use of data, and to reflect on the ethical and political implications of methodological choices. This approach supports research that not only generates empirical insights but also unsettles conventional modes of knowledge, contributing to more reflexive and just social science.



